|
SING
YOUR LIFE
In 2001 I was lucky enough to spend five
weeks in Europe, a place I love for many
reasons. But whenever I leave there, there
is one thing I miss above all others. Whether
you are walking by the crowded bars in Paris
or sitting in a café in Siena, Italy, there
are people singing - old people, drunk people,
tone-deaf people. Even when Europeans visit
the U.S., they walk in groups and sing.
They sing when they win soccer tournaments
and sing even louder when they lose. I spent
four days in Siena, a college town in northern
Italy built during the Roman era, and every
night I would open my hotel window and listen
to the locals singing - from 10 pm until
midnight or 1 in the morning, even on weeknights.
After dinner is done, one person would just
start belting out a tune, and invariably
the whole place would join in. Then another
person would start a song. Everyone in the
café, from 8 to 80 years old, knows the
songs and is perfectly at home crooning
even if he is three keys off.
This would never happen in America - not only because we feel self-conscious about singing, or because we have a tendency to sit indoors, shovel our food down and leave, but because none of us know the same songs. I sat for a minute and thought about it - what songs we have that everyone knows, that we can all sing anywhere, that celebrate life - and the only one I could come up with was Happy Birthday. And think of how you feel about singing that tune - or having it sung on your behalf. If there's a tablecloth at the table, you're under it by the third line. That's why the waiters bring you a free desert - as compensation for enduring such a horror. Music in the states - rock music - is meant to separate us from other generations, from other peer groups. Though it does bond you to a small group who share your taste (or lack thereof), it's largely based on individuality and rebellion, not on communion and tradition. Its value and purpose is different. If you are an indie rock snit, a band's appeal is in direct proportion to its obscurity. An obscure song would have no place at a European café, as no one would be able to sing it. New music is wonderful, and breaking molds is what has given us today's variety and innovation, but there is no balance here.
I think there are many reasons for this.
The old reasons people sang - to make work
in the fields easier to bear, to pass along
stories and myths and poems, to pass the
time around a campfire - no longer exist.
Americans also have no collective past to
speak of, though minorities often have this
sort of community, something you see at
their festivals. But even then, the audience
does not participate like it does at European
folk festivals. There is also a tremendous
pressure to be idividualistic and modern
here, which is obvious when you look at
soda or car commercials, which are basically
selling you rebellion and uniqueness.
I also think the invention of the phonograph
had a lot to do with it, though I am very
grateful to Edison for the most enjoyable
gadget of the 19th and 20th centuries. Record
players and cylinder rolls took music out
of the hands of citizens and put it into
the machine. It was no longer necessary
to have money or musical talent to hear
music. I don't think we realize how new
this phenomenon is. For 10,000 years people
have relied on their own voices and guitars
and lyres for songs. It is only over the
last 100 years that we have passed that
task onto strangers. We have gained much
from this, especially with the Internet,
which allows me to order CDs from Hungary
and Latvia, but we have lost something also
- the power of music to connect us to time,
to our own creative voice, and to each other.
Return
to Writing
|