|
QUANTUM
AND MANGUM
SCIENCE, GOD AND A FLYING
VICTROLA
I have been an atheist nearly
all of my life. My mother is a non-practicing
Catholic; a woman who, in college, would
not cross the threshold of a fraternity
house because she feared her soul would
be damned to hell. My father is agnostic.
I was baptized a Protestant (go figure),
and protest I do – against any organized
religion. I was also an atheist, until recently
– although considering my view of
“god,” most Westerners would
consider me one still.
The summer of ‘99, I began reading
in earnest about astrophysics. Aside from
music (I began playing piano at age five
and would sleep under – or in –
our piano from earlier than that), this
was my earliest fascination. I collected
National Geographic articles about the solar
system as a kindergartner. The books I have
read – from Sagan, Hawking, Asimov
and Feynman (the introductory authors) to
Kip Thorne’s Black Holes and Time
Warps and Ken Wilbur’s Quantum Questions:
The Mystical Writings of the World’s
Great Physicists – have brought me
to a surprising conclusion – one that
I was not even open to, let alone looking
for. I stopped believing in the tooth fairy
at five, Jesus at seven, and – much
to my despair – Santa Claus at eight
(he and my mother shared the same handwriting).
And yet I now find myself unable to reject
the notion that there is so much more to
life and the universe than we can experience,
yet comprehend, that the idea of a higher
logic or “god” (in the most
general sense) is difficult to deny. I am
not suggesting that science can prove or
disprove anything within the realm of spirit,
just that its laws suggest a reality far
beyond that which we perceive.
Just from the electro-magnetic spectrum
(which holds the “visual spectrum”
of the colors), there are several frequencies
that we cannot see – radio waves,
UV waves, micro-waves, etc. Add to that
the elasticity of space-time (things we
perceive as concrete), dimensions (there
may be 10, if string theory is proven correct),
the earth speeding through the galaxy (and
the galaxy speeding through the expanding
universe – none of which we can feel),
and the idea that matter is really just
energy condensed to its lowest velocity,
and you have a world that we can not even
gauge correctly, let alone explain. Astrophysics
has broken the “if we can’t
see or prove it, it doesn’t exist”
bond for me. When I read its laws and ideas,
I feel a presence, a peace and a connection
with all things and beings that I have never
known or expected.
I mention all this because it is the most
surprising and amazing thing that has happened
to me in my short life. Even though I don’t
endorse the philosophies of evangelical
Christians or those of other faiths, I feel
I do understand something of their origin.
This feeling – of a connection, of
a deeper consciousness – is the most
revelatory thing someone can experience,
as far as I know. An excerpt from Art and
Physics by Dr. Leonard Shlain:
“In Tertium Organum (1911), P.D.
Ouspensky, a Russian mathematician and philosopher,
describes how circumscribed entities existing
in two dimensions can be part of a unity
in the third dimension. Observe from one
side of a pane of frosted glass the prints
left by the tips of someone’s fingers
touching the opposite side. A two-dimensional
investigator, counting five separate circles,
would conclude that each fingerprint is
a separate entity. But we who can appreciate
the third dimension of depth, know that
the five separate fingerprints belong to
one unified object in three dimensions:
a hand. We also know that the three-dimensional
hand is attached to a being that generates
mind when time is added to the vectors of
space. By extrapolation, this is exactly
the example that illustrates how our separate,
individual minds, existing in our limited
perceptual apparatus using two coordinates,
space and time, could also be part of a
universal mind that is a unified entity
in the higher dimension of the space-time
continuum.”
I agree whole-heartedly with this and had
a similar vision (mine was of humans as
fingernails – relatively unconscious
things that shed themselves frequently,
yet contributed to and were connected to
an ultimately conscious being, that was,
in turn, connected to a higher organization).
I suppose all this sounds over-analyzed,
but it isn’t. It’s totally gut-instinct,
as all the best ideas are. And that is where
these ideas and art merge.
The most universal and intense experience
that human beings share is the search for
transcendence – that feeling of expanding
beyond your body, your mind, your time to
connect with other beings and the cosmos
itself. Some find it in religion or mysticism,
others in a song or poem, still others in
a physics lab. It’s all the same quest
– the Truth about what it is to exist.
The search for a unifying theory –
that which shows the perfection, balance,
and higher logic of the universe –
gave scientists like Einstein, Heisenberg
and Wheeler that feeling, which is why they
became mystics. And the “perfect”
art – which suggests the same by some
intrinsic push – gives others that
same ecstasy. There is an evolutionary benefit
to many of our feelings, even being in love,
but not for this. How could the most powerful
need we have come from and end in nothing?
Though I have been strangely moved by several
experiences in my life – from harvest
moons to seeing the Rosetta Stone –
there have been only two things that have
unequivocally given me a feeling of connection
with all things here and an eerie sense
of the richness of whatever lies beyond.
When I am depressed or nervous, lost or
fixated on some silly problem, I turn to
them and, instantly, they remind me that
my worries are dwarfed by the beauty and
mystery of That Thing That Is Everywhere,
Even In You. I have never found such peace
or giddy awe anywhere else. Despite the
fact that these two things are on opposite
sides of our social spectrum, the feeling
I get when I am in their presence is identical.
How strange that I stumbled across both
of them in the same summer. The first, of
course is astrophysics, and the second is
this silly little band.
Return
to Writing |